Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AI-driven model predicts haploidentical transplantation outcomes in a cohort, suggesting improved donor selection strategies.
We developed a novel, explainable artificial intelligence (AI)-driven prognostic model using a contemporary single-centre cohort of 668 patients undergoing haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) with post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) prophylaxis (2015-2024) to define the hierarchy of prognostic factors for overall survival. Employing a gradient boosting machine with explainable AI techniques, including partial dependence plots and surrogate decision trees, revealed a non-linear, U-shaped effect of donor age, with optimal outcomes for donors in their late 20 s to early 40 s. Recipient age was the dominant risk factor, modulated by donor age and HLA factors. HLA-DPB1 non-permissive mismatches were the most significant HLA factor (9.6% 3-year OS reduction), followed by HLA-B leader and HLA-DQB1 mismatches, with no independent effect of HLA-DRB1. The model accurately stratified patients into distinct risk quartiles, with 3-year survival ranging from 75% in the lowest-risk to below 20% in the highest-risk group. Critically, simulation analyses demonstrated that optimal donor selection (age 30, no key HLA mismatches) could shift a patient's risk profile by approximately one full quartile, significantly improving survival (e.g., Q3 patients from 20% to 50% 3-year OS). This study provides a practical, data-driven framework for personalized donor selection in the modern HCT era. Future multi-center validation studies are warranted.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mehta et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: