Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A case report shows effective T-tube drainage in managing esophageal injury complicated by sepsis in a low-resource environment, suggesting a viable alternative to complex procedures.
Introduction and importance: Esophageal perforation is a life-threatening emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality. Case presentation: A 28-year-old female presented with a cervical esophageal stab injury. An initial primary repair failed, and the patient developed severe sepsis. Surgical re-exploration revealed two esophageal perforations. The lateral perforation was repaired, and a T-tube was inserted through the anterior defect to create a controlled fistula. A feeding jejunostomy was also performed. The patient recovered fully following 9 weeks of T-tube drainage and enteral feeding. Clinical discussion: Cervical esophageal perforations present unique management challenges due to their proximity to vital structures and the high risk of mediastinal sepsis. Primary repair is preferred when feasible; however, failure can result in uncontrolled leakage and infection. In such cases, T-tube drainage provides a controlled fistula that allows decompression, sepsis control, and spontaneous closure once healing occurs. Compared to advanced techniques such as endoscopic stenting or vacuum-assisted closure, T-tube diversion is simple, inexpensive, and suitable for resource-limited environments. Adequate drainage, nutritional support through feeding jejunostomy, and close follow-up are critical to achieving favourable outcomes. Conclusion: T-tube drainage is a valuable salvage option in the management of complicated oesophageal perforations in resource-limited settings and nutritional support through feeding jejunostomy are key to optimizing outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vahwere et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: