The subject of the study is the role of the doll in cinema as an element of a visual-symbolic artistic system. The goal of the work is to identify the mechanisms of the doll's inclusion in the system of expressive means of fictional film and to determine its role in shaping the visual-symbolic structure of the frame. The paper examines the peculiarities of the interaction between the doll and the film's material environment, its participation in the formation of associative cinematic imagery, and the symbolic structure of the frame. It is shown that the inclusion of the doll in the cinematic image enhances the expressiveness of the visual series, actualizes hidden cultural codes, and deepens the visual perception of characters and events. It is specified that the doll functions as an object of dual nature – both material and symbolic, which allows it to serve as a mediator between different levels of artistic expression. The methodological foundation of the study consists of a semiotic approach, visual series analysis, comparative film studies methods, and the interpretation of artistic imagery. The relevance of the research is due to the insufficient study of the role of the doll in the structure of cinematic imagery: its visual function, symbolic potential, and mechanisms of inclusion in the artistic system of fictional cinema. It is noted that addressing the image of the doll expands the toolkit for analyzing visual structures and contributes to a fuller disclosure of the possibilities of cinematic language. The obtained results can be used in studies of visual semiotics, film language theory, and synthetic artistic systems. In conclusion, it is stated that the doll in cinema represents a stable expressive element that establishes additional levels of interpretation and meaning depth. It has been established that the doll, included in the structure of the fictional film, functions not only as an object but also as a sign, expanding the semantic field of the frame, enhancing the associative nature of the cinematic image, and allowing for non-verbal expression, which is particularly important for cinema as a visual art, of the metaphorical and philosophical depth of the work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dmitrii Miroslavovich Malich (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: