PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 5, 2026Humanities and Social Sciences Communications0 citationsOpen Access

Navigating foundational uncertainty: a dynamic-adaptive model of enterprise digital transformation in the age of generative AI

TLTianchi LuShandong University

Key Points

  • The research aims to redefine enterprise digital transformation in light of Generative AI's unpredictability, moving away from traditional models.
  • Critiques the Two-Layer Model of digital transformation.
  • Develops a new Dynamic-Adaptive Model for the era of Generative AI.
  • Analyzes the co-evolutionary relationship between firms and technology.
  • Proposes a cyclical process of Contention & Adaptation.
  • Identifies that established digital transformation models are obsolete due to Foundational Uncertainty.
  • Highlights the need for firms to engage in Adaptive Sensemaking.
  • Suggests that competitive advantage now relies on Dynamic Adaptive Capability.

Abstract

The advent of Generative AI (Gen-AI) has precipitated an epistemological crisis in strategic management, challenging the foundational assumptions of enterprise digital transformation. Traditional frameworks, operating under a “Paradigm of Rational Mastery”, view technology as a predictable, manageable tool. This paper argues that the unique technical characteristics of Gen-AI—specifically its “Emergent Abilities” and “Black-Box Nature”—have given rise to a novel strategic condition termed “Foundational Uncertainty”, rendering these established models obsolete. This study critiques the prevalent “Two-Layer Model” of digital transformation, which is predicated on predictable technological advancement and planned “enablement”. In its place, this paper develops and proposes a “Dynamic-Adaptive Model” designed for the Gen-AI era. This new model reconceptualizes the firm-technology relationship as a co-evolutionary process. It posits that firms must shift from planned implementation to continuous “Adaptive Sensemaking”, an action-driven process of experimentation and learning to navigate the technology’s unpredictability. At the enterprise level, strategy must become an “Evolutionary Process” that emerges from this learning. The model’s central mechanism is a cyclical interplay of “Contention & Adaptation”—a generative tension between top-down managerial control (exploitation) and bottom-up, technology-driven learning (exploration) that propels organizational evolution. Consequently, the source of sustained competitive advantage shifts from possessing static, inimitable (VRIN) resources to cultivating a higher-order “Dynamic Adaptive Capability”—the organizational meta-capability for reconfiguring its own learning processes to thrive amidst unknowable change. The paper concludes by outlining the model’s significant theoretical contributions to the literature on digital transformation, Dynamic Capabilities, and the Resource-Based View, providing a new framework for navigating the Gen-AI frontier.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tianchi Lu (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69a91e1fd6127c7a504c1bafhttps://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-06689-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Co-Evolutionary Synergies Between Generative AI and Digital Transformation: A Dynamic Capabilities–Resource-Based Framework for Innovation and Resilience2025
  2. 2Co-Evolutionary Synergies Between Generative AI and Digital Transformation: A Dynamic Capabilities–Resource-Based Framework for Innovation and Resilience2025
  3. 3Co-Evolutionary Synergies Between Generative AI and Digital Transformation: A Dynamic Capabilities–Resource-Based Framework for Innovation and Resilience2025
  4. 4Generative Artificial Intelligence as an Enabler of Organizational Ambidexterity in the Knowledge Economy2026
  5. 5Agentic Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Firm Strategy: A Governance-Adjusted Dynamic Capabilities Framework for Business Model Renewal2026