This analysis describes muscular fitness levels in U.S. youth, highlighting disparities across subgroups and suggesting the need for enhanced interventions.
Purpose: To describe muscular fitness (MF) levels and percentile benchmarks among U.S. children and adolescents aged 6–15 years old across sociodemographic, physiological, and behavioral subgroups. Methods: Data were from the 2012 NHANES National Youth Fitness Survey (NNYFS). Four strength tests consisting of the plank, knee extension, modified pull-up, and handgrip, were analyzed by age, sex, race/ethnicity, income, BMI category, cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and physical activity (PA) among 1,234 participants (51% male) using SAS SURVEY procedures. Results: Mean ± SEM scores were 69.6 ± 1.8 s (plank), 56.6 ± 4.2 lb (left) and 59.2 ± 4.3 lb (right) knee extension, 5.5 ± 0.3 pull-ups, and 21.2 ± 0.3 kg handgrip strength. Male adolescents (12–15 y) scored higher than females on all tests (p < .05). Non-Hispanic Black youth outperformed White and Mexican American peers on knee extension (p < .05), whereas Mexican American youth had the lowest scores. Healthy-weight youth performed better on plank and pull-ups, while peers with obesity showed higher knee extension and grip strength (p < .005). Adolescents in the Healthy Fitness Zone for CRF outperformed high-risk peers on plank, pull-up, and grip tests (p < .001). Children meeting PA guidelines completed more pull-ups (p < .005) but had lower knee extension and grip strength (p < .01). Percentile analyses revealed similar patterns but greater variability and widening disparities toward the upper percentiles. Plank ranged from 36 s (25th) to > 127 s (90th), knee extension from ~33 lb to > 100 lb, handgrip from 14 to > 33 kg, and pull-ups from 0 to 13 reps. Conclusions: These nationally representative MF benchmarks for U.S. youth highlight subgroup disparities and support the need for continued surveillance to guide youth strength promotion initiatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McDonough et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: