Numerical analysis reveals flow dynamics and wake patterns in rotating dual-step cylinders, affecting vortex behavior.
Flow past a rotating dual-step cylinder is investigated numerically for a Reynolds number of Re =150 and a smaller to larger diameter ratio d = 0.5. The dual-step cylinder comprises one larger diameter cylinder with two smaller diameters on its two ends, arranged coaxially. Simulations are conducted for L = 2 to 40, where L is the larger cylinder length to diameter ratio. The length of the larger cylinder affects the wake. For a non-rotating cylinder, the two N-cells near the two steps combine, forming a mode N-S with one N-cells and two S-cells when L = 2 to 12. When L = 15 to 40, l -cell coexist with N-cells, and the wake is in mode N- l -S with two N-cells, one l -cell and two S-cells. For a rotating cylinder, mode N- l -S does not exist when the rotation rate α=0.5 because the wake is in the direct mode. The boundary length L of the SC between mode N-S and mode N- l -S for α =1 is significantly reduced compared with a non-rotating step cylinder. The distinct feature of the wake for larger rotation rates between 2 and 4 is the existence of two streamwise hub vortices generated from the two steps, respectively. The attraction and cancellation effects between the two hub vortices affects the wake. An increase in α enhances the two hub vortices and attraction between them, however the stronger attraction effect between the two hub vortices reduces their strength. At L = 2, the two hub vortices are so close to each other that they combine, resulting in a very chaotic wake. • Simulations are conducted for larger cylinder length-to-diameter ratio L = 2 to 40. • When L = 2 to 12, the wake has a mode N-S wake with one N-cells and two S-cells. • When L = 15 to 40, the wake is mode N-L-S with two N-cells, one L-cell and two S-cells. • Mode N-L-S does not exist when the rotation rate α=0.5 because the wake is in the direct mode. • For greater rotation rates, two streamwise hub vortices interact with each other strongly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: