Observational study investigates correlations between personality traits and anatomical biomarkers in CSCR, suggesting psychological factors may influence disease characteristics.
Background: To investigate the anatomical and psychological characteristics of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy (CSCR) using a multimodal approach combining spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) and psychometric profiling. The study aims to explore potential correlations between personality traits and disease features to inform future risk stratification and management. Methods: A case–control observational study involving 44 participants (22 patients with CSCR and 22 age- and sex-matched healthy controls). Participants underwent high-resolution OCT to assess choroidal thickness, subretinal fluid, and photoreceptor integrity. Psychological profiles were evaluated using the Personality Inventory for DSM-5–Brief Form (PID-5-BF) and the Temperament Evaluation of Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego–Brief (TEMPS-A-brief). Data were statistically analyzed using Python 3.11, with significance set at p 0.05. Results: CSCR was more prevalent in males (male:female ratio of 10:1), with a mean age of 50.6 years. OCT revealed increased choroidal thickness, photoreceptor disruption, and subretinal fluid in affected individuals. A positive correlation was found between age and choroidal thickness (ρ = 0.41; p 0.05). No significant association was found with corticosteroid use. Although group comparisons in psychological traits were not statistically significant, a trend toward elevated negative affectivity was observed in the CSCR group. Conclusions: CSCR appears to result from a multifactorial interaction between anatomical and psychological components. While no definitive psychological markers were identified, elevated negative affectivity may serve as a vulnerability trait in susceptible individuals. Further longitudinal and larger-scale studies are necessary to validate these findings and investigate the utility of psychological screening in CSCR care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luca et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: