Prospective analysis predicts mortality and neurological outcomes in cardiac arrest patients, suggesting machine learning models may improve accuracy.
Background Patients resuscitated from cardiac arrest (CA) commonly have poor outcomes with a high mortality rate. We aimed to determine the predictive values of serum soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells 1 and 2 (sTREM-1 and sTREM-2) in patients after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) and to develop machine learning (ML) prediction models. Methods We prospectively enrolled adult CA patients successfully resuscitated after cardiopulmonary resuscitation between November, 2021 to December, 2023. Serum sTREM-1, sTREM-2 and other biomarkers were measured on days 1, 3 and 5 after ROSC. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was 3-month neurological prognosis. The performance of serum sTREM-1, sTREM-2, as well as the developed ML prediction models, to predict 28-day all-cause mortality and 3-month neurological prognosis were studied. Results The study enrolled 120 patients, including 32 survivors and 88 non-survivors, with 30 healthy volunteers. Both sTREM-1 and sTREM-2 levels increased in patients after ROSC, with a larger increase in the non-survivors than survivors. Moreover, eleven features, including sTREM-1 and sTREM-2, were ultimately identified to build ML models. Among other ML models, the eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) and Random Forest (RF) models showed strong performances for predicting 28-day all-cause mortality and 3-month neurological prognosis, respectively. Conclusion Serum sTREM-1 performed better than sTREM-2 to predict mortality and neurological outcome after ROSC. Furthermore, the newly developed XGBoost and RF models incorporating sTREM-1 and/or sTREM-2 demonstrated superior predictive accuracy compared to conventional clinical scoring systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: