Novel framework enhances literature retrieval quality in multi-turn conversations, indicating better outcomes in diverse domains.
Academic literature retrieval is constrained by the paradox of "information overload" versus "evidence scarcity", a tension that deepens when researchers iteratively refine their queries in multi-turn conversational settings. To address this challenge, we propose Conversational Literature Personalized Re-ranking (CLPR), a personalized framework that unifies dense semantic retrieval with personalized user profiling. CLPR first performs a broad high-recall retrieval to collect candidate documents, then compresses conversational history into a concise textual profile that encodes sequential continuity, immediate focus, and long-term research background via a large language model. The generated profile serves as a pseudo-query for a neural cross-encoder to produce the final ranking. Cross-domain testing on the public LitSearch (computer science) benchmark confirms its robust generalization, yielding an NDCG@10 of 0.4793. On MedCorpus, a new multi-turn biomedical conversational retrieval benchmark constructed for this study, CLPR attains state-of-the-art performance with P@1 = 0.9497 and NDCG@10 = 0.9271, surpassing the strongest baseline by substantial margins. Ablation shows long-term background cues contribute most, and maintaining a short, up-to-date profile across turns outperforms a static one. CLPR therefore delivers accurate, personalized literature retrieval and can accelerate evidence synthesis across scientific domains.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: