PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026International Journal of Educational Development0 citationsOpen Access

Pursuing academic excellence in Kazakhstan: Stakeholder perspectives and reform challenges

View Full Paper
AZAknur ZhidebekkyzyRKRenata KudaibergenovaTBTimur Buldybayev

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand stakeholder perspectives on academic excellence in Kazakhstan's higher education system and identify challenges and strategies for reform.
  • Conducted 28 semi-structured expert interviews
  • Utilized Atlas.ti for qualitative analysis
  • Explored enabling and constraining factors for academic excellence
  • Analyzed stakeholder perceptions regarding institutional development
  • Excellence is defined broadly, focusing on talent and social impact
  • Challenges include resource limitations, governance issues, and regional disparities
  • Experts emphasize the need for long-term funding and inclusive decision-making
  • Calls for context-sensitive approaches balancing global visibility with national relevance

Abstract

Achieving academic excellence is essential for enhancing education quality, research impact, and institutional competitiveness in a rapidly evolving global landscape. This study examines how academic excellence is understood and implemented in Kazakhstan’s higher education system, as the country launches national Academic Excellence Initiatives (AEIs). Based on 28 semi-structured expert interviews analysed using Atlas.ti, the study investigates stakeholder perceptions, enabling and constraining factors, and practical implementation strategies. Findings show that excellence is understood in broad terms – centred on talent, institutional development, and social impact – rather than narrowly defined by rankings. While some challenges reflect global trends, such as resource limitations and governance constraints, others – like regional disparities and legacy structures – are context-specific. Experts highlighted the importance of long-term funding, inclusive decision-making, and a stronger focus on human capital, with particular attention to the needs of regional universities facing structural disadvantages. The study offers timely insights for policymakers and contributes to debates on excellence in post-Soviet and developing countries. Conceptually, it extends the literature by applying the World-Class University, institutional isomorphism, and Triple Helix frameworks to explain tensions between global visibility and national relevance. It calls for context-sensitive, differentiated approaches that balance global ambitions with national priorities and institutional diversity in higher education reform.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhidebekkyzy et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa6f3c531e4c4a9ff59533https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2026.103552
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper