A quasi-experimental study evaluates oral antibiotic transition in patients with uncomplicated bloodstream infections, indicating improved treatment rates without clinical harms.
Background Oral (PO) antibiotics are effective in treating uncomplicated bloodstream infections (BSIs), but they are underutilized. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a standardized antimicrobial stewardship intervention for early transition to PO antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated BSIs. Methods A quasi-experimental study was conducted before and after implementation of a standardized stewardship intervention for patients with uncomplicated non-staphylococcal BSI over a four-month period. Rates of PO transition and clinical outcomes were compared pre- and post-intervention. The primary outcome was rate of PO transition. Clinical failure (relapsed bacteremia, infection-attributable death, or new deep-seated infection with BSI organism) was a secondary outcome. Results A total of 187 and 177 BSIs were evaluated pre- and post-intervention, respectively. Overall, 44% (82/187) and 43% (76/177) met pre-specified criteria for PO transition; transition rates increased from 59% (48/82) pre-intervention to 93% (71/76) post-intervention (p<0.01). Baseline characteristics including severity of illness, underlying diseases and source of BSI were similar between groups. Clinical failure occurred in 7% (6/82) and 7% (5/76) of patients in the pre- and post-intervention groups at 90 days, respectively. Total mean antibiotic therapy duration was shorter in the post-intervention group (12.15 vs. 10.76 days; p=0.02). Secondary outcomes including length of stay, 30-day readmission, and antibiotic adverse events were similar between groups. Conclusion The implementation of a real-time antimicrobial stewardship intervention resulted in an increased rate of transition to PO antibiotics and fewer overall days of therapy without an observed difference in clinical or safety outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tate et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: