PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Biomass Futures2 citationsOpen Access

Bioethanol Revolution: Integrating Feedstock Innovation with Energy-Efficient Processes under Life Cycle Assessment

View Full Paper
MAMustafa M. AminMEMosaab A. ElbagerRIRasheed Hamid Mohammed Ibrahim

Key Points

  • Evaluate innovative feedstocks and processes for sustainable bioethanol production while assessing their environmental impacts.
  • Review advances in second- and third-generation bioethanol from lignocellulosic sources, residues, and microalgae.
  • Conduct comparative life-cycle assessments of different bioethanol production pathways.
  • Analyze techno-economic viability of various bioethanol processes including SSF, SSCF, and CBP.
  • Lignocellulosic ethanol shows potential for 40–91% GHG reductions compared to gasoline.
  • Mature sugar/starch routes are competitive at costs of ∼$0.34–$0.47/L with reduced carbon impact.
  • Waste/residue pathways are identified as robust options for near-term production; microalgae methods remain less viable due to cost and energy issues.

Abstract

The global energy system remains heavily dependent on fossil fuels, increasing the need for renewable liquid alternatives. Bioethanol is a major gasoline substitute that can reduce petroleum use in transport by 5–27% under typical blending mandates (E10–E27) and up to 100% on an energy basis in neat ethanol applications (E100). However, first-generation production from food crops raises economic and food–fuel concerns. This review synthesizes recent advances in second- and third-generation bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass, agricultural and industrial residues, and microalgae, with emphasis on process intensification and sustainability performance. A comparative life-cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis evaluate pathways based on net energy ratio, life-cycle GHG emissions, and production cost. Lignocellulosic ethanol can achieve 40–91% GHG reductions relative to gasoline, though costs remain variable (∼0. 21–1. 25/L). Mature sugar/starch routes show competitive costs (∼0. 34–0. 47/L) with significant carbon benefits when land-use change is minimized. Waste/residue pathways emerge as the most robust near-term option, while microalgae-based ethanol remains limited by energy and cost constraints (NER < 1; ∼0. 76–0. 91/L). Overall, this review identifies the most viable deployment routes and key research priorities for advancing low-carbon bioethanol systems. • Integrates novel feedstocks with modern bioethanol conversion technologies. • Reviews enzymatic, thermochemical, and microbial innovations for 2G ethanol. • Compares SSF, SSCF, and CBP processes for cost-effective bioethanol yield. • Includes life cycle assessment of various bioethanol production pathways. • Identifies scalable and sustainable strategies for future bioethanol deployment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Amin et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa7087531e4c4a9ff5a55ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmf.2026.100034
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Biomass, Seed and Energy Yield of Cynara cardunculus L. as Affected by Environment and Season2020 · 24 citations
  2. 2Life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from three feedstocks and two fermentation waste reutilization schemes2016 · 33 citations
  3. 3Consolidated bioprocessing of the organic fraction of municipal solid waste into bioethanol2024 · 33 citations
  4. 4Catalytic selectivity of Rh/TiO 2 catalyst in syngas conversion to ethanol: probing into the mechanism and functions of TiO 2 support and promoter2017 · 35 citations
  5. 5Biomass-derived syngas production via gasification process and its catalytic conversion into fuels by Fischer Tropsch synthesis: A review2019 · 457 citations