PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Entrepreneurship and innovation.0 citations

The Limits of Digital Empowerment in Entrepreneurship Education in Yunnan Border Ethnic Universities: A Qualitative Study

KQKe QiQujing Normal UniversityGYGong YunhongQujing Normal University

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the limitations of digital empowerment in entrepreneurship education at ethnic border universities in Yunnan.
  • Document analysis of educational materials and policies
  • Case studies of entrepreneurship courses
  • Interviews with educators and students in three ethnic-border universities
  • Identified infrastructure and digital literacy gaps particularly affecting rural minority students
  • Found that generic digital tools do not fit local entrepreneurial needs
  • Highlighted a focus on formal outputs hindering local engagement and social responsibility

Abstract

Under China's "AI + Education" strategy, universities in Yunnan's ethnic border regions have rapidly introduced digital tools into entrepreneurship education, including AIGC content generators, data dashboards and virtual simulation platforms. Existing narratives often celebrate these technologies as straightforwardly "empowering". Based on document analysis, course case studies and interview-based qualitative evidence from three ethnic-border universities in Yunnan, this paper critically examines the limits of such empowerment. The findings show three intertwined constraints. First, a foundational limit emerges from gaps in infrastructure access, digital literacy and trust, particularly affecting rural minority students and senior teachers. Second, an adaptation limit arises when generic digital tools and case repositories, designed for coastal economies, fail to align with local entrepreneurial fields such as specialty agriculture, ethnic cultural industries and border trade. Third, a value limit appears as tool rationality and platform metrics narrow entrepreneurship education toward formal outputs (business-plan templates, polished slides) at the expense of deep engagement with local problems, emotional resilience and social responsibility. These limits are rooted in regional digital divides, university evaluation systems and a broader culture of technological solutionism. The paper concludes by proposing a "warm digitalization" approach that reorients technology use from tool-driven adoption to scenario- and problem-driven integration.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Qi et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70a9531e4c4a9ff5a94dhttps://doi.org/10.47297/wspeiwsp2516-253514.20250906
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Digital Empowerment and Rural Transformation: How Digital Rural Development Shapes Non‐Agricultural Entrepreneurship in China2026
  2. 2An Empirical Study on Assessing the Role of Digital Platforms in Shaping Entrepreneurial Opportunities2025 · 2 citations
  3. 3Digital Habitus and Institutional Compensation: Mechanisms and Governance Pathways of the Innovation–Entrepreneurship Divide between Urban and Rural University Students in China2025
  4. 4How Does Digital Technology Encourage Entrepreneurship Among College Students? A Study on Digital Entrepreneurship in China2025
  5. 5Mapping Digital Literacy Thresholds in South African Higher Education and the Implications for Entrepreneurship Education in an Industry 4.0 Paradigm2025