Evaluates biopesticides' effectiveness in disrupting feeding behavior of Empoasca onukii in tea plants, suggesting alternatives for pest management.
Empoasca onukii severely damages tea plants as a major sap-sucking pest, leading to the increasing adoption of biopesticides as a sustainable alternative to chemical control. However, existing research has largely focused on the final lethal effects of these agents, while their short-term interference patterns on pest feeding behavior remain unclear. In this study, six biopesticides—azadirachtin, matrine, Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium anisopliae CQMa421, Mamestra brassicae nucleopolyhedrovirus (MbNPV), and Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt)—were evaluated using the electrical penetration graph (EPG) technique to precisely analyze their interference on the short-term (6 h) feeding behavior of E. onukii, alongside field trials to validate control efficacy. EPG analysis revealed that different types of biopesticides significantly disrupted feeding in distinct ways. The two botanical pesticides and CQMa421 mainly prolonged the non-probing phase (waveform Np) and reduced active non-phloem feeding (C waveform) (p < 0.05); Bt and B. bassiana significantly extended the resting phase (waveform R) and decreased the frequency of passive phloem feeding (waveform E) (p < 0.05), whereas MbNPV exhibited a combined effect, simultaneously prolonging both Np and R waveforms while reducing waveform C (p < 0.05). Field trials showed that all tested treatments achieved complete control (100%) at 21 days post-application. Moreover, across a wide range of concentrations, they all demonstrated excellent and stable control performance. These findings provide diverse agent options for the green control of E. onukii in tea plantations and lay a foundation for constructing a green integrated pest management system centered on biological control for tea plant pests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: