PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 2026Buildings5 citationsOpen Access

Failure of a Code-Compliant Reinforced Concrete Building: Damage Patterns and Nonlinear Seismic Response

View Full Paper
OOOnur OnatInonu UniversityİKİbrahim Baran KaraşinDicle UniversityBYBurak YönMunzur University

Key Points

  • The research aims to explore the seismic performance limitations of a code-compliant reinforced concrete building that collapsed during an earthquake.
  • Classified structural and non-structural damage patterns in newly constructed RC buildings.
  • Conducted nonlinear fiber-based static and dynamic analysis of the collapsed building.
  • Used ground motion records scaled to match the site-specific design spectrum.
  • Examined shear wall-to-floor area ratio and vertical element distribution effects.
  • Identified critical shear wall deficiencies that amplified torsional response.
  • Showed that localized member failure led to collapse, rather than global strength issues.
  • Noted dynamic base shear demand reached approximately 30% of the building's maximum capacity.
  • Found that prescriptive code compliance did not guarantee satisfactory seismic performance.

Abstract

This study investigates the seismic performance limitations of a newly constructed reinforced concrete building that collapsed during the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş–Elbistan earthquake despite formal compliance with current seismic design requirements. Beyond the specific earthquake event, the study addresses a broader scientific problem: the limited understanding of the relationship between observed damage mechanisms and nonlinear dynamic response in mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings. The first part classifies recurring structural and non-structural damage patterns identified in newly constructed RC residences. The second part presents a nonlinear fiber-based static and dynamic analysis of a collapsed mid-rise building. Nonlinear dynamic analyses were conducted using ground motion records scaled to match the site-specific elastic design spectrum defined by TBDY 2018, corresponding to predefined seismic performance levels rather than an incremental dynamic analysis framework. The results indicate that an extremely low shear wall–to–floor area ratio (0.0357%) combined with asymmetric vertical element distribution significantly amplified torsional response and local shear demands. Nonlinear dynamic analyses showed that critical shear walls exceeded Collapse Prevention limits under DD2-level excitation, while system-level shear contribution limits remained within code-defined thresholds. Dynamic base shear demand corresponded to approximately 30% of the maximum nonlinear capacity obtained from pushover analysis, indicating that localized member failure rather than global strength deficiency governed the collapse mechanism. The analytically identified critical members were consistent with the observed collapse configuration, particularly at the soft ground story. The findings demonstrate that prescriptive code compliance alone may not ensure satisfactory seismic performance when structural irregularities, torsional amplification, and detailing deficiencies coexist. The results are consistent with damage patterns reported in other recent destructive earthquakes and contribute to improving the understanding of collapse mechanisms in code-compliant RC buildings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Onat et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70a9531e4c4a9ff5a9cdhttps://doi.org/10.3390/buildings16051012
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper