This study presents an explainable knowledge graph (KG) framework that transforms continuous spindle monitoring time-series data into transparent, reasoning-ready diagnostic structures. Existing data-driven approaches, while accurate, often lack the interpretability required for high-stakes industrial decision-making and are sensitive to operating condition drifts. To address these limitations, we propose a two-level temporal segmentation method combining label transition detection and statistical drift analysis to identify meaningful state boundaries. Furthermore, a percentile-based discretization mechanism converts statistical features into interpretable semantic tags. A Neo4j-based state–event–feature schema captures lifecycle evolution and evidence relations, enabling attribution path reasoning that links failure events to salient precursor features. Experiments on real industrial spindle data demonstrate a fault detection accuracy of 84.97% and a false alarm rate of 3.43%, effectively capturing stable baselines and intermittent abnormal bursts. The proposed framework provides a distinct novelty in bridging the gap between numerical time-series and symbolic reasoning, offering a practical pathway for deploying explainable and maintainable spindle health analytics.
Cheng et al. (Wed,) studied this question.