Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study demonstrates improved risk stratification in women through co-testing, indicating enhanced cervical cancer prevention.
Background/Objectives: Co-testing may improve cervical cancer prevention by stratifying women into groups with different absolute risks of CIN2+, CIN3+, and cervical cancer. We evaluated real-world co-testing with cervical cytology and a genotype-specific HPV E6/E7 mRNA assay targeting HPV16, HPV18, and HPV45 (PreTect SEE) in routine clinical practice. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, registry-based cohort study at the Department of Clinical Pathology, University Hospital of North Norway. Eligible co-test samples (liquid-based cytology with concurrent HPV mRNA testing, both with valid results) from routine screening, follow-up, and clinically indicated testing were identified from the laboratory information system and passively followed for worst histological outcome through December 2025. Outcomes were no biopsy/<CIN2, CIN2+, CIN3+, and cervical cancer. Results: Among 116,217 eligible co-test samples (mean age 43.9 years), cumulative risks were 4.4% for CIN2+, 1.5% for CIN3+, and 0.1% for cervical cancer. Baseline HPV mRNA positivity was 3.9%, and cytology was ASC-US+ in 12.2% of samples. Co-testing produced a clear stepwise risk gradient. Double-negative results (NILM/mRNA−; 86.7%) had very low risks (CIN3+ 0.2%; cervical cancer 0.02%). ASC-US+/mRNA− results (9.3%) showed intermediate risks (CIN3+ 4.1%; cervical cancer 0.2%). NILM/mRNA+ results (1.1%) showed substantially higher risks despite normal cytology (CIN3+ 13.0%; cervical cancer 0.5%). Double-positive results (ASC-US+/mRNA+; 2.8%) had the highest risks (CIN3+ 28.5%; cervical cancer 2.3%). Within NILM, mRNA positivity captured 42.7% of CIN3+ cases and 25.0% of cancers. Genotype-specific analyses showed highest risks for HPV16, followed by HPV18 and HPV45. Conclusions: Co-testing with cervical cytology and a 3-type HPV mRNA assay provided strong, clinically interpretable risk stratification and identified a small but high-risk subgroup among women with normal cytology. These findings support genotype-specific HPV mRNA testing as an adjunct to cytology in routine care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sørbye et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: