PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 6, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Printing Hybrid, Interdigitated Back-Contact Solar Cells

View Full Paper
GLGuancheng LiDTDavid Angel TrujilloROR. L. Opila

Key Points

  • The research aims to fabricate interdigitated back-contact solar cells entirely using inkjet printing techniques.
  • Utilized a single inkjet printer for printing PEDOT:PSS, TiO2, and metal lines.
  • Eliminated the need for vacuum deposition or a back surface field diffusion.
  • Introduced co-solvent to improve PEDOT:PSS performance and passivated the silicon surface.
  • Achieved a short-circuit current (Jsc) of 19.2 mA/cm² from the printed solar cells.
  • Noted improvements in fill factor and efficiency due to modified printing techniques.
  • Identified the need for an anti-reflective coating and improved metal contact ink for better device performance.

Abstract

Interdigitated back-contact solar cells were fabricated entirely with inkjet printing. poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):polystyrene sulfonate (PEDOT:PSS), TiO2, and metal lines were printed on a textured silicon substrate with only one inkjet printer. No vacuum deposition or diffusion of a back surface field is needed for the printed IBC solar cell. Adding co-solvent to the PEDOT:PSS and passivation of the Si surface significantly reduced the losses and enhanced the short-circuit current, Jsc, and, as a result, improved the fill factor and efficiency of the devices. The thickness of the PEDOT:PSS layer is approximately half a micrometer measured by profilometer, which is thicker than the optimal range typically reported; there is still a best short-circuit current, Jsc, of 19.2 mA/cm2. To further improve the performance of the devices, an anti-reflective coating on the front side is required. Also, an improved metal contact ink is needed to improve the contact resistance between the PEDOT:PSS layer and the metal contact. The initial performance of all printed cells are compared to conventionally fabricated devices.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69aa70d6531e4c4a9ff5b10chttps://doi.org/10.3390/ma19050985
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Efficient Perovskite/Silicon Tandem Solar Cells Using Hybrid Two‐Step Inkjet Printing with Edge Isolation Precision2025 · 13 citations
  2. 2Spin‐On SiO x ‐Assisted Inkjet Printing for Interdigitated n+ and p+ Poly‐Si/SiO x Contacts in Silicon Solar Cells With Suppressed Unintended Doping2026
  3. 3All inkjet-printed organic solar cells on 3D objects2024 · 10 citations
  4. 4Process and design guidelines for inkjet-printed organic photovoltaic cells – using the example of PM6:Y62025 · 3 citations
  5. 5Evaluating the performance of inkjet-printed transparent anode in biological photovoltaic systems2024