To address the challenges of designing geologically compatible, large-scale gas drainage strategies in gassy coal mines, this study introduces an integrated workflow combining detailed gas-geological unit subdivision with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for the Baode Coal Mine. This approach aims to transform gas drainage technology selection from empirical judgment to a systematic, quantitative decision-making process, thereby enhancing control precision and mine safety. First, the No. 8 coal seam was refined into ten distinct gas-geological units (II-i to II-x), forming the foundation for a targeted management strategy. For these units, a quantitative evaluation index system was constructed, integrating key factors such as permeability, structural characteristics, and unit area. The AHP was then employed to assess the adaptability of four primary drainage technologies: ULB-uni/bi (underground long borehole unidirectional/bidirectional drainage), UULB (underground ultra-long directional borehole drainage), UDLB-SHF (underground directional long borehole drainage with staged hydraulic fracturing), and FHWS (fractured horizontal wells drilled from the surface). The decision analysis reveals significant regional differentiation in technical suitability. FHWS ranks highest in structurally complex and water-rich zones. UDLB-SHF and UULB serve as viable, cost-effective alternatives to FHWS in various scenarios, with UULB being particularly advantageous for “large-area pre-drainage” in extensive panels with relatively simple geology. ULB-uni/bi is confirmed as the most economical option but is suitable only for minor blocks with simple conditions. Consequently, the study proposes a hierarchical, zone-specific strategy: prioritizing surface-based FHWS for high-risk zones, employing UDLB-SHF for active permeability enhancement in low-permeability resource-rich areas, utilizing UULB for efficient large-area drainage, and restricting ULB-uni/bi to small, geologically normal blocks. Ultimately, this research establishes a robust technical selection system that integrates fine geological subdivision, AHP-based multi-criteria evaluation, and targeted technology matching. It provides a scientific basis for balancing risk control and cost optimization in gas drainage design for the Baode Coal Mine. In summary, the methodological framework proposed in this study provides a systematic approach for coal mine gas control under complex geological conditions. Its core value lies in achieving the unity of scientificity and practicality in gas control technology decisions through standardized analysis logic and differentiated adaptation mechanisms, thereby providing support for the precise and efficient development of coal mine gas control.
Luo et al. (Wed,) studied this question.