Systematic review reveals CAR-T therapy promotes sustained remissions in autoimmune diseases, suggesting new treatment pathways.
Objectives Current therapeutic paradigms for treatment-refractory rheumatic diseases rely on chronic immunosuppression with variable efficacy and potential for cumulative toxicity. We systematically synthesised evidence on the clinical efficacy, safety and durability of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Methods We conducted a systematic review following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42025641602). Five databases were searched from inception to February 2025 for primary studies investigating CAR-T therapy in autoimmune rheumatic diseases. Two reviewers independently assessed studies using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomised Studies of Interventions tool. Results 12 studies encompassed 44 patients with severe treatment-refractory disease across six rheumatic conditions. Patients had extensive prior exposure (median 5 therapies), including conventional and biological agents. Cluster of Differentiation antigen 19 (CD19)-targeted constructs predominated (83% of studies), with emerging dual-target approaches (17%). Universal clinical responses were achieved (100% of studies; individual response rates 92%–100%), with complete responses occurring within 2–16 weeks. Sustained drug-free remissions extended 6–46 months, accompanied by profound autoantibody reductions (80%–99% across disease-specific markers). Safety profiles diverged markedly from oncological experience: cytokine release syndrome (CRS) remained exclusively confined to grades 1–2, while immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity occurred in 25% of studies, with predominantly grade 1 severity. Conclusions CAR-T therapy demonstrates substantial efficacy in treatment-refractory rheumatic diseases, achieving sustained remissions through comprehensive B-cell elimination. Importantly, safety profiles were favourable, with CRS limited to grades 1–2 severity, no grade ≥3 events and rare immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity, representing markedly superior tolerability compared with oncological applications. PROSPERO registration number CRD42025641602.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santosa et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: