This analysis shows how rebirth fits various metaphysical views on human identity, suggesting broad applicability.
I argue that rebirth (reincarnation) is metaphysically versatile, in the sense that it can be made to work with a variety of popular metaphysical views about the human person. By drawing on the Buddhist appeal to karmic causation in place of a transmigrating soul, I sketch accounts of rebirth, or something close enough to rebirth for us to care about, that are suited to Baker's constitutionalism, Lewis's four-dimensionalism, and Olson's animalism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Justin Mooney (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: