Calorimetric analysis reveals how heat treatment affects precipitate behavior and strength in aluminum alloys, suggesting optimization methods.
Aluminum alloy EN AW-7049A samples in artificial (T6 temper) and after multi-stage aging (T77 temper, i.e. retrogression and reaging treatment- RRA), were investigated by means of differentialscanning calorimetry (DSC).DSC was employed to distinguish the dissolution behavior of different metastable and Cu-enriched precipitate populations in EN AW-7049A alloy in the T6 and T77 tempers. DSC thermographs exhibited two consecutive endothermic peaks in the T6 temper, which correspond to the sequential dissolution of metastable semi-coherent phases. First peak correspondsto the main strengthening η' phase, the second peak is associated with the dissolution of thermally more stable Cu-enriched η′/incipient η precipitates. These Cu-rich precipitates enhance yield strength and hardness by increasing dislocation resistance and significantly improve thermal stability by retarding precipitate coarsening and overaging.In the T77 temper, only a single endothermic peak was observed, indicating a reduced concentration of metastable η′ precipitates and the predominance of coarser η′ or incoherent equilibrium η precipitates formed during the retrogression and reaging treatment. The dissolution and transformation of metastable semi-coherent precipitates during RRA promote the nucleation and growth of the stable incoherent η phase, particularly at grain boundaries, leading to strength reduction. Consequently, the increased fraction and coarsening of η precipitates account for the lower strength of the EN AW-7049A alloy in the T77 temper compared with the initial T6 temper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marinković et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: