Demonstrates robust sensor placement in structural health monitoring, suggesting improved reliability and damage detection amidst sensor failures.
In the field of structural health monitoring systems, sensors serve as the fundamental components for assessing infrastructure integrity. The rationality of their spatial configuration significantly influences the precision of structural performance assessment, the efficacy of damage detection algorithms, and the operational reliability of the system throughout its designated lifecycle. A robust optimization methodology for the placement of multi-type sensors is proposed in this study, explicitly formulated to mitigate the negative impact of sensor malfunctions during long-term operation. First, a rigorous evaluation framework for sensor placement schemes is established based on Bayesian inference and the minimization of information entropy, thereby quantifying the uncertainty inherent in parameter identification. Then, a probabilistic model of sensor failure is developed utilizing the Weibull distribution to capture time-dependent reliability characteristics, combined with a modified information entropy calculation method that mathematically assimilates these failure probabilities into the optimization objective. Finally, a heuristic search strategy is employed to achieve the robust optimal placement of multi-type sensors, efficiently navigating the complex combinatorial search space. In contrast to deterministic information entropy (DIE) methodologies, which assume ideal sensor functionality, the robust information entropy (RIE) approach comprehensively accounts for the stochastic nature of sensor failures and their impact on the information content of the monitoring network, thereby significantly augmenting the robustness and redundancy of the sensor configuration. Validations utilizing a numerical frame structure and a finite element bridge model demonstrate that the RIE method effectively integrates the sensor failure probability model to yield robust optimal placement schemes, minimizing the risk of information loss and ensuring reliable structural health monitoring throughout the engineering lifecycle.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zeng et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: