Comparative study explores how conflict dynamics affect heritage recovery in Mosul and Benghazi, indicating the need for tailored approaches.
Cultural heritage remains a critical yet underrecognized factor in armed conflicts. Deliberate targeting, mobilization, and manipulation of heritage sites can exacerbate conflict dynamics and become early casualties of war. Since the Arab Spring, conflicts across the Arab Region have inflicted extensive damage on built heritage, a situation compounded by weak economies, prolonged neglect, mismanagement, and limited institutional capacity in the heritage sector. This paper examines how conflict dynamics—encompassing actors, methods, resources, environments, and both material and immaterial impacts—with the addition of the agency of heritage sites during the conflict, shape post-conflict governmental responses and reconstruction efforts toward heritage. Focusing on the comparative case studies of Mosul, Iraq, and Benghazi, Libya, we analyze conflict triggers, escalation patterns, resolution processes, emergent power structures, and international involvement that collectively influence post-conflict heritage recovery. Despite similarities in timeline, urban warfare, and the fight against ISIS, the divergent approaches to heritage management in both cities underscore the complex interplay between conflict outcomes and cultural memory. Contributing to academic discourse on post-conflict urbanism and heritage recovery in rebuilding cities affected by conflict, this research highlights the importance of understanding conflict dynamics and post-conflict contexts to better protect and recover heritage after war.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Valdeolmillos et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: