Editorial highlights the need for peer reviews to enhance nursing scholarship, encouraging broader participation.
An important aspect of NSQ is having scholarly submissions peer-reviewed to determine publication decisions, such as reject, accept with revisions, or accept. These decisions are based on feedback from the comments of peer-reviewers, along with the alignment of the submitted papers with the journal's purpose and aims. NSQ looks forward to reviewers joining the editorial board or being contacted through the Web of Science to provide peer reviews for submitted works. The refinement and expansion of unique nursing and health sciences knowledge must continue well into the 21st century; this continuation is dependent on scholars and researchers serving as peer reviewers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mario R. Ortiz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: