In vitro study compares all-resin post designs with fiber-reinforced posts, revealing similar fracture resistance.
Purpose: This in vitro study evaluated the fracture resistance of dual-cure resin cement and core build-up material (Core-X ® Flow) used as all-resin posts of two different lengths, compared with conventional fiber-reinforced posts, and to analyze failure patterns. Material and Methods: Thirty extracted human single-rooted mature teeth (premolars, canines, and maxillary central incisors) were endodontically treated and randomly assigned to three groups (n=10). Group A received a 10 mm fiber post with Core-X Flow, Group B received a 10 mm all-resin post with Core-X flow, and Group C received a 5 mm all-resin post with Core-X flow. Fracture resistance was evaluated under compressive loading using a universal testing machine, at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min, and the failure patterns were assessed using a digital stereomicroscope. Data were analyzed using a one-way ANOVA (p> 0.05). Results: Fracture resistance did not differ significantly among the three groups (p> 0.05). Mean values were 430.28 N for Group A, 422.16 N for Group B, and 434.56 N for Group C. Failure mode analysis showed that Group C (5 mm all-resin posts) exhibited the highest number of favorable (repairable) fractures, followed by Group A (fiber posts) and Group B (10 mm all-resin posts). Conclusion: All-resin posts demonstrated fracture resistance comparable to fiber-reinforced posts. Shorter all-resin posts produced more favorable failure outcomes, suggesting that they may offer a conservative and clinically viable option for restoring endodontically treated teeth. These findings should be interpreted within the limitations of an in vitro design and small sample size.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Altassan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: