Research reveals a dual-PROTAC strategy enhances target degradation in cancer, suggesting improved therapeutic utility.
Proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are bifunctional molecules bridging a target protein with an E3 ubiquitin ligase, promoting its ubiquitylation and degradation. Unlike traditional inhibitors, PROTACs exploit transient interactions, enabling the selective degradation of “undruggable” proteins, thereby expanding the landscape of druggable targets. However, PROTACs are not without limitations. The “hook effect”—a phenomenon where high PROTAC concentrations reduce efficacy due to inactive binary complex formation—compromises their clinical utility. Additionally, single PROTACs may fail to achieve complete degradation due to insufficient polyubiquitination or suboptimal E3 ligase recruitment, limiting their therapeutic efficacy. These challenges highlight the need for strategies to enhance PROTAC performance and so therapeutic applicability. In this study, we introduce a novel dual-PROTAC strategy that recruits two distinct E3 ligases, such as KEAP1 and VHL, to cooperatively degrade KRAS(G12D) and Androgen Receptor (AR). Our data demonstrate that combining KEAP1- and VHL-recruiting PROTACs synergistically enhances target degradation, reduces the required dosing, and minimizes off-target effects. Notably, KEAP1 recruitment offers the unique advantage to favour polyubiquitin chains elongation, thereby improving proteasomal recognition. In conclusion, dual-targeting approach represents a promising avenue for optimizing PROTAC-based therapeutics. Citation Format: Sehbanul Islam. Unveiling Synergistic Potential of VHL and KEAP1-based PROTACs for Targeted Protein Degradation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RAS Oncogenesis and Therapeutics; 2026 Mar 5-8; Los Angeles, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2026;86(5_Suppl_1):Abstract nr A025.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sehbanul Islam (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: