Compares joinability and performance of double-flush riveting and resistance welding in high-strength steel sheets, suggesting effective alternatives for structural applications.
The applicability of two different joining processes for producing lap joints from high-strength steel sheets is investigated, reflecting their increasing use in advanced lightweight structures with demanding performance requirements. The work is primarily focused on the joining-by-forming process known as double-flush riveting, evaluated in two variants: one utilizing forged holes and the other employing machined holes. The performance of these two variants is compared with conventional fusion-based resistance spot welding using lap joints fabricated from 2 mm high-strength low-alloy S500MC steel sheets under varying geometric and process conditions, with support from finite element modelling. Results indicate that both double-flush riveting variants produce similar joint cross-sectional geometries, but the machined hole variant simplifies sheet preparation and eliminates the need for a progressive tooling system. Tensile lap-shear and peel test results reveal that double-flush riveted joints with forged holes exhibit superior strength, attributed to strain hardening in the forged regions. Furthermore, for nuggets and rivets of equivalent size, both double-flush riveting variants surpass resistance spot welding in terms of the mechanical strength of the final joints. These results suggest that double-flush riveting represents a promising alternative for assembling high-strength steel sheets in lightweight structural applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sampaio et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: