Comparative analysis reveals track type impacts on adhesion and stress distributions in metro systems, enhancing understanding of wear issues.
Metro line has the characteristics of short station distance, low operating speed, frequent traction /braking, high acceleration and deceleration, small curve radius and various track types. The wheel-rail low adhesion behavior, wear and damage problems are prominent under such a complicated operation condition. This article compares and analyzes the wheel-rail adhesion characteristic on four kinds of tracks, including the concrete slab bed track, steel-spring floating slab track, elastic support block track and trapezoidal sleeper track, revealing the adhesion degradation mechanism of metro wheel-rail system under different operating conditions, such as traction and braking. The results indicate that there are differences in the creepage response and the lowest limit of the wheel-rail adhesion coefficient on different track structures, while the maximum adhesion coefficient of the four track structures under traction/braking conditions shows a similar trend with the variation in speed and adhesion conditions. Traction and braking loads, as well as wheel-rail adhesion conditions, exert a relatively minor influence on the normal contact stress distribution of the wheel-rail interface, but significantly affect shear stress distributions. This study is shown to enhance the understanding of the combined effects of adhesion degradation and track types on the wheel-rail contact stress and surface damage.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: