Investigation reveals that firms enhance auditor quality when investing in tax havens, implying better governance and reduced risks.
We investigated the effect of direct investments in tax havens on firms’ auditor choices and found that because tax-haven investments intensify agency problems and information asymmetry, firms tend to hire high-quality auditors to address these issues, with this tendency being stronger in firms with weak internal-governance mechanisms or poor information environments. The economic consequences analysis revealed that while selecting high-quality auditors for tax-haven investments increases the likelihood of a nonstandard audit opinion, it significantly decreases the probability of regulatory violations and enhances firm value. Our study provides empirical evidence for firms’ auditor-choice behavior in the context of overseas investments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wei et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: