This article presents the Legal Design Journal, aiming to enhance coherence in legal design scholarship, indicating its importance for the field.
This short piece introduces the Legal Design Journal. It argues that the development of a journal has been a necessary complement to other activities that have helped build legal design into a cognate discipline and field of practice. It posits that a specialised journal will help legal design research scholarship to become more coherent and more critically self-reflective. The article goes on to outline how the Journal was created as a deliberate design project, drawing on user-research, co-creation, ideation and prototyping.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael E. Doherty (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: