Review evaluates load frequency control approaches in smart grids, highlighting improvements and ongoing challenges.
The integration of renewable energy sources (RESs) into modern power systems has introduced significant challenges in maintaining system stability and reliability. Among these challenges, load frequency control (LFC) has become a vital area of research. The variable nature of RESs, such as wind and solar, along with their intermittent availability, necessitates advanced management systems for effective frequency regulation. LFC plays a crucial role in ensuring the stability and performance of electrical power systems by managing frequency through the balance of supply and demand, accounting for variations in load, generation, and other disturbances within the system. In traditional power systems, LFC is achieved through a combination of primary, secondary, and tertiary control mechanisms. However, the advent of smart grids has considerably complicated and enhanced the potential for LFC. In these smart grids, which leverage digital communication, sensors, and automation technologies, LFC becomes more intricate and adaptable. These systems not only utilize traditional centralized control but also incorporate RESs, decentralized resources, energy storage solutions, and real-time data to improve frequency management. This research methodically evaluates current LFC techniques using a hierarchical control and technology-focused framework, classifying approaches as conventional, intelligent, and hybrid control schemes within centralized and decentralized system architectures. An evaluative analysis reveals that while intelligent and hybrid control strategies markedly enhance dynamic frequency response and robustness with substantial renewable energy source (RES) integration, persistent challenges remain regarding controller coordination, scalability, computational requirements, and real-time execution. The analysis highlights adaptive hybrid intelligent control schemes, namely those that combine data-driven learning with physical system models, as the most promising avenue for future research, particularly in low-inertia and highly dispersed smart grid scenarios.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ntuli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: