Research identifies a rapid method for tracing tea varieties, suggesting accuracy in quality control.
To establish a rapid traceability method for tea varieties and address the limitations of traditional identification techniques, this study focused on four types of tea—Longjing, Maofeng, Zhuyeqing, and Biluochun—using near-infrared (NIR) spectroscopy. A total of 84 sets of NIR spectra were collected and preprocessed using Savitzky–Golay smoothing (S-G), multiplicative scatter correction (MSC), standard normal variate transformation (SNV), and first derivative (1stDer) methods. Dimensionality reduction and feature selection were then performed using principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), their combination (PCA-LDA), and the successive projections algorithm (SPA). Classification models based on multiple linear regression (MLR) and support vector machine (SVM) were constructed and evaluated via five-fold cross-validation to assess generalization ability and stability. The results indicated that the SVM model significantly outperformed the MLR model in overall classification and generalization. The PCA-LDA combined approach proved to be the most effective feature selection method. The optimal classification model for tea variety traceability was achieved using MSC or SNV preprocessing combined with PCA-LDA-SVM, yielding a mean five-fold cross-validation accuracy of 96.67%. The confusion matrix revealed that misclassifications mainly occurred between Longjing and Biluochun and between Maofeng and Zhuyeqing, which can be attributed to similarities in processing techniques and chemical composition among these tea varieties. This study provides a rapid, non-destructive, and accurate spectroscopic detection method for tea quality control and traceability, offering a valuable reference for the rapid identification of agricultural products.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhou et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: