The analysis reveals improved population coupling coordination in urban areas of China, indicating factors like fiscal decentralization and human capital drive these changes.
Accurately characterizing the relationship between nighttime human activity intensity and population distribution is essential for understanding urban development. This study proposes an integrated analytical framework that combines multilevel coupling quantification, regional trend detection, and interpretable machine learning to examine the Nighttime Lights and Population Coupling Coordination Degree (NPCCD) across China from 2012 to 2022. Based on this framework, NPCCD is evaluated from grid to regional level, and the characteristics of effective, persistent, and newly added coupled regions are identified. Twelve socioeconomic indicators are further constructed as explanatory variables to model NPCCD using machine learning algorithms, and Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) is applied to interpret the outputs. The results show that 49.07% of China’s overall NPCCD experienced steady improvement during the study period. Significant regional disparities were observed: in the eastern and central regions, more than 60% of grids fell into the improving category, whereas nearly half of the grids in the western and northeastern regions remained unchanged. Newly emerging coupling areas exhibited an average NPCCD of 0.03, markedly lower than the 0.07 observed in persistent effective areas, reflecting a mismatch between infrastructure development and population growth. Population density, human capital, industrial upgrading, and fiscal decentralization jointly explained 58.4% of the model’s variance and were identified as the major driving forces, each showing pronounced nonlinear and interaction effects. This study provides a quantitative framework for evaluating the coordination between nighttime lights and population distribution and offers insights for sustainable and balanced regional development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: