Simulation shows that cost allocation methods impact savings in energy communities, highlighting the role of citizen participation.
Energy Communities (ECs) have emerged as a key instrument for promoting local renewable energy integration and citizen participation in the energy transition. While their economic performance largely depends on the ability to generate savings through self-consumption and internal energy trading, their long-term viability is strongly influenced by how these savings are distributed among heterogeneous participants. Despite extensive literature on cost allocation methods, there remains a lack of integrated, data-driven approaches that clearly disentangle the sources of savings in ECs and examine how different allocation methods perform under realistic operating conditions. This paper presents a simulation-based analytical framework to quantify the economic savings generated within Energy Communities and to analyse how a set of widely used cost allocation methods distribute these savings among participants. The approach explicitly separates savings due to renewable self-consumption from those arising from internal trading in a Local Energy Market and explores allocation outcomes across a broad range of community configurations. Extensive simulations based on both synthetic and real-world consumption and price data are used to examine community-level savings, individual outcomes, surplus distribution patterns between Net Consumers and Net Producers, and computational tractability. The results show that internal energy trading consistently increases community-level savings, although its contribution is typically modest relative to self-consumption and strongly dependent on contextual factors such as renewable penetration, demand heterogeneity, and price conditions. The analysis highlights important trade-offs between savings generation, surplus distribution, and computational feasibility, underscoring the relevance of context-aware selection of allocation mechanisms. Overall, the proposed approach provides a transparent and reproducible tool for analysing the economic performance of Energy Communities under practical constraints.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González-Asenjo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: