Cross-sectional study reveals physical performance differences in elite padel players, suggesting training load may vary by playing side.
Objectives: The physical and physiological characteristics of padel players are essential for appropriate training load prescription; however, this area remains underexplored. Therefore, this hypothesis-driven study aimed to analyse physical and physiological differences in male padel players according to playing side. A secondary objective was to observe the influence of training volume on these parameters. Methods: Fourteen high-level male players competing in professional circuits or top-level regional competitions participated in this cross-sectional study using directional (one-tailed) testing. Results: Vertical jump performance differed significantly between the countermovement jump (CMJ) and the Abalakov jump (ABK) (p < 0.001), with lower values in the CMJ (40.98 cm) compared with the ABK (46.96 cm). Isometric handgrip strength showed significant inter-limb differences (p < 0.001), with greater force in the dominant hand (49.08 kg) than in the non-dominant hand (44.22 kg). Mean completion time in the agility t-test was 10.40 s (95% CI: 10.06–10.74 s). The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test showed a mean distance of 404.28 m, corresponding to an estimated VO2max of 50.79 mL·kg−1·min−1. Playing side significantly affected Yo-Yo performance and estimated VO2max (p = 0.036), with higher values in left-side players. Although no significant differences were found in handgrip strength according to playing side. As expected, weekly training frequency did not significantly influence any variable. Conclusions: These findings help characterise the physical and physiological profile of high-level padel players and provide practical reference values to support training prescription and performance monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
González-Jiménez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: