Game theory reveals data sharing can be stable and beneficial in AI firms, suggesting careful management of incentives and privacy concerns.
This paper examines how game theory can be used to model and design data-sharing strategies between firms developing artificial intelligence. It explores both competitive and cooperative settings, analyzing how incentives, market structure, privacy concerns, and platform design affect data-sharing outcomes. Two core models are discussed: a non-cooperative game between competing firms and a cooperative model involving Shapley value allocation. The study highlights when data sharing can be stable, fair, and beneficial for innovation while identifying potential risks to competition and consumer welfare.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stefan Otto Novak (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: