New algorithms improve numerical performance in dynamic systems using linear multi-step methods and the midpoint rule.
• New single-step and linear multi-step time integration methods are developed. • The methods achieve second-order accuracy with controllable numerical dissipation. • The framework bridges the Park method and the Crank-Nicolson/midpoint rule. • Superior numerical performance is shown by comparisons with widely used methods. This paper presents a new family of implicit time integration algorithms with controllable numerical dissipation for first- and second-order initial value problems. The generalized time-weighted residual methodology provides the fundamental design framework, which is further investigated through cubic approximations to construct a new class of single-step algorithms with optimized numerical properties. Equivalent linear multistep formulations are also derived to enclose the design space. A non-standard stability analysis via the second-order equation of motion and a novel initialization strategy enable the proposed algorithms to achieve second-order accuracy in time, unconditional stability, zero-order overshooting, and controllable numerical dissipation and dispersion through a user-defined parameter, ρ ∞ , with optimal spectral accuracy. For the first time, the proposed computational framework unifies the L-stable Park method ( ρ ∞ = 0 ) and the A-stable midpoint rule ( ρ ∞ = 1 ), while introducing a spectrum of novel schemes for 0 < ρ ∞ < 1, which do not require a distinct starting procedure as with their equivalent linear multistep counterparts. The enhanced dissipation control is validated through detailed comparisons with existing single-step and sub-step/multi-stage algorithms. Numerical examples involving both first- and second-order dynamic problems further demonstrate the improved numerical performance. The MATLAB code for the two-dimensional nonlinear heat transfer and three-dimensional solid mechanics problems is open-source to demonstrate the numerical implementations and compare the performance of various time integration algorithms in practical applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: