Key result
Contrast-enhanced convex echocardiography improves RV apical visualization and RVFAC reliability vs sector transducers in dogs.
Why the study?
Accurate assessment of right ventricular wall thickness, myocardial visualization, and chamber dimensions is crucial in veterinary cardiology but remains understudied in dogs.
Does the use of convex transducers and contrast agents improve right ventricular visualization and fractional area change measurement in healthy dogs compared to sector transducers?
Population
10 healthy beagle dogs
Comparison
Sector transducer vs convex transducer vs convex transducer with contrast agent
Design
Prospective observational study
Authors
Loading...
Supports contrast-enhanced convex echocardiography for RVFAC in dogs; extends visualization reliability in veterinary cardiology.
Observational (n=10)
Does the use of convex transducers and contrast agents improve right ventricular visualization and fractional area change measurement in healthy dogs compared to sector transducers?
Convex transducers and contrast-enhanced echocardiography improve right ventricular visualization and the reliability of fractional area change measurements in dogs.
Park et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Healthy beagle dogs (n=10). Convex transducer with or without contrast agent vs. Sector transducer was evaluated on Myocardial visualization and inter-observer agreement. Convex transducers offered superior visualization and inter-observer agreement in near-field segments compared to other approaches (ICC: 0.12-0.92 vs. 0.06-0.73).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: