Key result
Anticoagulation reversal strategies during CPB vary significantly across Europe, especially in protamine dosing and hemostasis monitoring.
Why the study?
Heterogeneity exists across Europe in anticoagulation reversal strategies and hemostasis monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass, with significant variability remaining in protamine dosing, post-reversal monitoring, and viscoelastic assay use.
Cross-Sectional (n=114)
Yes
A Europe-wide survey highlights significant heterogeneity in anticoagulation reversal strategies and haemostasis monitoring during cardiopulmonary bypass, indicating a need for standardization.
OBJECTIVES: Clinical practice in anticoagulation management, particularly in heparin administration, monitoring, reversal and haemostasis, is known to differ significantly. To better characterize this variability, we conducted a Europe-wide survey aimed at mapping current practices, identifying areas of consensus and divergence and guiding future research and standardization efforts. METHODS: A 27-question electronic questionnaire was designed by an expert panel and distributed across European cardiac surgery centres with a snowball sampling method. Results were examined via descriptive statistics, with categorical variables shown as percentages and 95% CIs. RESULTS: A total of 114 centres from 29 countries completed the questionnaire between February and April 2025. Most centres were high-volume institutions (>500 cases/year, 59.6%) and reported the use of written heparinization protocols (78.1%)-initial heparin dose of 300 IU/kg in 61.4%. Many used normothermic perfusion (52.6%). Pre-cardiopulmonary bypass activated clotting time (ACT) targets varied from 400 s (41.2%) to 480 s (38.6%). There was significant heterogeneity in reversal practices: heparin: protamine ratios were 1:1 in 57.0%, <1:1 in 36.8%, and >1:1 in 6.1%. Universal post-reversal ACT target was absent in 70.2%, with 78.1% using an ACT value close to baseline. Although almost all centres (90.4%) had viscoelastic testing, clinical criteria alone were used in 48.2% to guide transfusion decisions. Only 83.3% of centres had any explicit protocol for managing high-bleeding-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: While essential heparinization practices demonstrate consensus across Europe, heterogeneity exists in anticoagulation reversal strategies and haemostasis monitoring. However, significant variability remains in protamine dosing, post-reversal monitoring, and the use of viscoelastic assays, representing an opportunity to optimize patient care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pereira et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Anticoagulation management during cardiopulmonary bypass (n=114). Anticoagulation management practices was evaluated on Current practices in anticoagulation management. A Europe-wide survey of 114 cardiac surgery centres revealed significant heterogeneity in anticoagulation reversal strategies, with heparin:protamine ratios of 1:1 in 57.0% and <1:1 in 36.8%.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: