Systematic review compares abnormal uterine bleeding risks in women on DOACs versus LMWH/VKA, suggesting better reporting is needed.
Venous thromboembolism (VTE) disproportionately affects reproductive-age women, and abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) associated with anticoagulation, particularly direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), remains under-reported. Suboptimal AUB management may lead to iron deficiency anemia (IDA) and recurrent VTE. To compare the incidence and risk of AUB in women receiving DOACs versus low molecular weight heparin/vitamin K antagonists (LMWH/VKA) for VTE, and quantify anemia and iron deficiency risks. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis using MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases (inception-June 2024) for randomized trials and prospective studies. Eligible studies reported AUB in women receiving DOACs, LMWH/VKA, aspirin, or placebo. Primary outcomes were major bleeding (MB), clinically relevant non-major bleeding (CRNMB) from uterine sites, and unspecified AUB; secondary outcomes were IDA and recurrent VTE. Pooled incidence and relative risks (RR) were calculated using random-effects models. Twenty-one studies were included (10 RCTs, 11 cohorts). AUB definitions varied: MB (n=12), CRNMB uterine bleeding (n=10), pictorial bleeding assessment chart (n=2), unspecified AUB (n=7). Overall uterine bleeding risk did not differ between DOACs and LMWH/VKA (RR 1.47, 95% CI 0.93-2.33). DOACs showed no increased MB/CRNMB risk but had higher unspecified AUB (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.57-4.57). Rivaroxaban showed a 2.7-fold higher AUB risk vs LMWH/VKA (p<0.01). Data on iron deficiency and anemia were limited. AUB risk with DOACs varies by bleeding definition. The increased risk of non-ISTH-defined AUB, particularly with rivaroxaban, is obscured when relying on standard bleeding criteria. Improved reporting and consistent definitions are needed to better understand gender disparities in VTE treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Taree et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: