Introduction Urban flood modeling requires accurately representing building structures, as they influence flow paths, flood depths, and hydraulic dynamics in urban basins. However, the comparative performance of commonly used building representation techniques within rain-on-grid applications remains insufficiently quantified. This study assesses the effectiveness of three building representation techniques—Stubby Building (SB), Building Block (BB), and Building Resistance (BR)—in the urbanized Podoniftis basin, Attica, Greece. Methods Using a 2 m resolution digital elevation model within a rain-on-grid framework, buildings are represented with BB using 5 m and 12 m building footprint elevations, SB using a 0.5 m elevation, and BR using increased Manning’s roughness coefficients of 1 and 10 over building footprints. Results The different methods substantially influence simulated flood extent, water depth, and velocity fields. The BB method yields the highest mean depths (0.62 m) but tends to concentrate high-water depths adjacent to buildings in densely built-up areas. The BR method produces a larger flooded area with the lowest mean velocity (0.27 m/s), reflecting higher hydraulic resistance and a more distributed water storage. The SB method provides an intermediate behavior between the three approaches, while not explicitly resolving runoff generation and redistribution associated with building ingress and drainage systems. A Flood Hazard Rating assessment further shows that building representation affects the spatial pattern of hazard classes. Discussion The findings highlight that building representation is a key modeling choice in rain-on-grid applications, with each technique producing distinct flood hazard patterns that can influence risk management decisions. These results underline the need for more refined techniques that explicitly incorporate drainage networks and building ingress processes for urban flood hazard assessment.
Alexopoulos et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: