PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 8, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología2 citationsOpen Access

Effect of building representation on pluvial flood risk in urban areas: the Podoniftis basin, Greece

MAMarcos Julien AlexopoulosPDPanayiotis DimitriadisEMEmela Mitsi

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of different building representation methods in urban flood modeling.
  • Utilized a 2 m resolution digital elevation model within a rain-on-grid framework.
  • Assessed three building representation techniques: Stubby Building (SB), Building Block (BB), and Building Resistance (BR).
  • Implemented various elevations and roughness coefficients for building representations.
  • The BB method produced the highest mean flood depth at 0.62 m but concentrated depths near buildings.
  • The BR method resulted in a larger flooded area with the lowest mean velocity of 0.27 m/s.
  • Each method led to distinct flood hazard patterns, influencing risk management decisions.

Abstract

Introduction Urban flood modeling requires accurately representing building structures, as they influence flow paths, flood depths, and hydraulic dynamics in urban basins. However, the comparative performance of commonly used building representation techniques within rain-on-grid applications remains insufficiently quantified. This study assesses the effectiveness of three building representation techniques—Stubby Building (SB), Building Block (BB), and Building Resistance (BR)—in the urbanized Podoniftis basin, Attica, Greece. Methods Using a 2 m resolution digital elevation model within a rain-on-grid framework, buildings are represented with BB using 5 m and 12 m building footprint elevations, SB using a 0.5 m elevation, and BR using increased Manning’s roughness coefficients of 1 and 10 over building footprints. Results The different methods substantially influence simulated flood extent, water depth, and velocity fields. The BB method yields the highest mean depths (0.62 m) but tends to concentrate high-water depths adjacent to buildings in densely built-up areas. The BR method produces a larger flooded area with the lowest mean velocity (0.27 m/s), reflecting higher hydraulic resistance and a more distributed water storage. The SB method provides an intermediate behavior between the three approaches, while not explicitly resolving runoff generation and redistribution associated with building ingress and drainage systems. A Flood Hazard Rating assessment further shows that building representation affects the spatial pattern of hazard classes. Discussion The findings highlight that building representation is a key modeling choice in rain-on-grid applications, with each technique producing distinct flood hazard patterns that can influence risk management decisions. These results underline the need for more refined techniques that explicitly incorporate drainage networks and building ingress processes for urban flood hazard assessment.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Alexopoulos et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69ada836bc08abd80d5bb49ehttps://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2026.1757749
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Building Treatment and Its Effects on City‐Scale Urban Flood Modeling2026
  2. 2Assessment of different building representations in numerical urban flood modeling2024
  3. 3Comparison of Pluvial Flooding Modeling Software Applied in Highly Urbanized Settlements Using the Case of Lake Ganzirri2025
  4. 4Effect of Urban Drainage Inlet and Building Treatment on Urban Waterlogging Simulation Under Different Storms2026
  5. 5Flood impact assessment in urban settings with porous buildings – insights from a fine-scale hydraulic-economic model2024 · 2 citations