This review discusses patient-specific implants improving orbital fracture reconstruction, suggesting better outcomes.
Orbital wall fractures are among the most common maxillofacial injuries and require precise reconstruction to restore orbital volume, prevent diplopia, and avoid long-term sequelae such as enophthalmos or facial asymmetry. Traditional reconstruction techniques have relied on autologous grafts and preformed alloplastic implants; however, these approaches are limited by intraoperative variability, imprecise contour restoration, and increased operative time. Over the past decade, the emergence of patient-specific implants (PSIs), designed through advanced three-dimensional (3D) imaging, computer-aided design, and computer-aided manufacturing, has transformed the field of orbital reconstruction. PSIs allow highly accurate anatomical restoration, reduce intraoperative manipulation, and improve clinical outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the evolution of orbital fracture reconstruction, design and fabrication principles of PSIs, clinical evidence supporting their use, limitations, and future directions, including bioactive materials, artificial intelligence-driven design, and point-of-care 3D printing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: