Demonstrates improved MRI protocol accuracy in non-experts, suggesting the utility of AI for better healthcare outcomes.
MRI protocoling, the process of selecting appropriate sequences, is especially complex in musculoskeletal (MSK) cases. This study evaluates whether a large language model (LLM) can effectively assist non-experts in MRI protocoling. We collected two retrospective datasets of musculoskeletal (MSK) MRI orders: (1) a prompt-development dataset (Jan–Dec 2023; 538 cases) and (2) a testing dataset (Jan–Jun 2024; 107 cases). A prompt was refined on GPT-4o via the web-based ChatGPT interface to use patient information and complete an MRI protocol worksheet. For the testing dataset, 6 non-experts (three radiology residents [RD] and three radiographers [RG]) completed the worksheet with and without LLM-assistance. All worksheets were scored using a clinical pass system, categorizing responses as “excellent (4 points),” “acceptable (3 points),” “insufficient (2 points),” or “failure (1 point)” based on potential outcomes. We compared clinical pass scores between LLM-assisted and human-only worksheets using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and a mixed linear model. Fleiss’ kappa across five iterations was measured for stochasticity. LLM-assisted worksheets had higher average clinical pass scores than human-only worksheets for both RD (3.42 vs. 3.18, p < 0.001) and RG (3.06 vs. 2.9, p < 0.001). LLM-assistance decreased the proportion of “insufficient” and “failure” cases, potentially decreasing MRI re-checks, with an average reduction of 12.2% (13 out of 107) for RD and 8% (8.7 out of 107) for RG. This improvement was consistent across professions (p = 0.43). LLM outputs showed strong reliability across five iterations (κ = 0.66). LLM-assistance improves the performance of non-experts in MSK MRI protocoling and has the potential to reduce repeat scans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: