This essay analyzes Harper’s correspondence as a resistance tool in the abolitionist press, indicating its significance in journalism.
This essay analyzes Frances Ellen Watkins Harper’s antebellum newspaper correspondence in the abolitionist press. I argue that Harper’s correspondence constituted diverse readerships as members of a print counterpublic responsible for resisting tyranny. By drawing on Gabrielle Foreman’s theory of simultextuality as a textual object capable of signaling multiple audiences at once, this essay contributes to scholarship on nineteenth-century Black journalism by analyzing how Harper turned to the conventions of correspondence to craft transportable texts. Rather than modeling Black subjectivity for readers through individual correspondents’ personas, I argue that Harper’s public letters deemphasized authorial subjectivity, addressing subscribers in multiple discursive registers at once. Ultimately, Harper’s correspondence exhibited a critical form of sentimentalism that intervened in dominant discourses and emphasized the need for readers to respond.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alexandra Burgess (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: