Key result
IFCC mass-spectrometry reference panel successfully harmonizes Lp(a) measurements across five immunoassays.
Why the study?
Lipoprotein(a) concentrations were inconsistent between immunoassays, necessitating investigation of harmonization using an IFCC-endorsed reference measurement procedure.
Does recalibration using a serum panel value assigned with the IFCC-MS-RMP improve harmonization of Lp(a) measurements across different immunoassays?
Observational (n=540)
Yes
Does recalibration using a serum panel value assigned with the IFCC-MS-RMP improve harmonization of Lp(a) measurements across different immunoassays?
Harmonization of Lp(a) measurements across different immunoassays can be achieved using a serum panel value assigned with the IFCC-MS-RMP, reducing inter-assay variability.
AIM: Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C). The Lp(a) concentrations were inconsistent between the immunoassays. This study aimed to investigate whether harmonization of Lp(a) measurements can be achieved using a serum panel value assigned with the IFCC-endorsed mass spectrometry-based reference measurement procedure (IFCC-MS-RMP). METHODS: We measured the Lp(a) concentrations using five Lp(a) immunoassays in 40 panel sera provided by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and 500 Japanese subjects enrolled in the Bunkyo Health Study. Of the five immunoassays, only the Roche Lp(a) assay was traceable to the WHO-IFCC reference material SRM2B. Lp(a) concentrations in CDC samples were also determined by IFCC-MS-RMP, provisionally calibrated to SRM2B. Lp(a) concentrations were expressed in mass units (mg/dL) for most reagents, but in SI units (nmol/L) for Roche's reagent and IFCC-MS-RMP. RESULTS: , 0.986-0.998) although the slopes of the regression lines ranged from 0.292 to 0.579. After recalibration with the CDC's panel sera, Lp(a) results of Bunkyo Health Study samples were converted to the equivalent values determined by the IFCC-MS-RMP, thus resulting in a marked reduction in the intermethod CV among the assays. CONCLUSION: We achieved harmonization of Lp(a) measurements with five immunoassays using a serum panel value assigned with the IFCC-MS-RMP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Miida et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Lipoprotein(a) measurement (n=540). Recalibration using CDC serum panel assigned with IFCC-MS-RMP vs. Unharmonized immunoassays was evaluated on Intermethod coefficient of variation (CV) among Lp(a) assays. Recalibration of five Lp(a) immunoassays using a CDC serum panel assigned with the IFCC-MS-RMP resulted in a marked reduction in the intermethod CV among the assays.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: