Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 26, 2018European Journal of Clinical InvestigationOpen Access

Time to challenge the spurious hierarchy of systematic over narrative reviews?

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

Trisha GreenhalghTrisha GreenhalghUniversity of OxfordSTSally ThorneUniversity of British ColumbiaKMKirsti MalterudForskning.no (Norway)

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Greenhalgh et al. (2018) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af7e3362334f84fadb29aahttps://doi.org/10.1111/eci.12931
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't1996 · 15,917 citations
  2. 2Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions2010 · 5,224 citations
  3. 3Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews2007 · 4,464 citations
  4. 4A Proposal for More Informative Abstracts of Review Articles1988 · 103 citations
  5. 5Metasynthetic Madness2016 · 132 citations