PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
March 10, 2026KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering3 citationsOpen Access

Impact of One-Side Wart-Type Roughness on Hydraulic Resistance and Flow Dynamics in Supercritical Open-Channel Flows

View Full Paper
HAHossein Sohrabzadeh AnzaniSKSameh Ahmed KantoushSKSohei Kobayashi

Key Points

  • To assess how one-side wart-type roughness affects the Chezy roughness coefficient and flow dynamics in supercritical open-channel flows.
  • Conducted experiments in a rectangular flume with a 2% bed slope.
  • Compared smooth bed conditions with rough beds featuring wart-type protrusions.
  • Measured velocity profiles at five transverse points (A-E).
  • Analyzed data using power spectral density and one-way ANOVA.
  • Chezy coefficient decreased by 9-27% in rough beds compared to smooth beds.
  • Local velocities in rough beds ranged from 0.819-1.174 m/s, while smooth beds had a velocity of 1.151-1.169 m/s.
  • Energy dissipation and loss were significantly higher in rough channels, with losses at 0.0046 m versus 0.0027 m in smooth channels.
  • Higher turbulence was confirmed at higher wavenumbers via power spectral density analysis.

Abstract

The aim of this study is assess the impact on the Chezy roughness coefficient ( C c ), velocity distribution, energy dissipation and turbulent structures. The experiments were carried out in a rectangular flume at a bed slope of 2% that compared the smooth bed conditions with rough beds that had wart-like protrusions arranged at a 20 cm distance. Five transverse points (A-E) were measured to find the velocity profile, which were then analyzed using dimensionless parameters, power spectral density (PSD) and ANOVA (one-way). Findings have shown that one-sided wart-type roughness caused a very large decrease of Chezy coefficient by 9-27%, from 52.89-54.18 in smooth beds to 39.47-47.47. This decrease is an indication of significant rise in hydraulic resistance and turbulence. Heterogeneous velocity profiles were added by rough beds, and local velocities were 0.819-1.174 m/s versus the smooth bed of 1.151-1169 m/s. The dissipation of the energy was increased and the energy loss ( h L ) in rough channels was 0.0046 m almost twice of smooth channels (0.0027m). It was verified that rough beds have higher turbulence at higher wavenumbers by PSD analysis. The big effect of the roughness density on C c was verified by One-way ANOVA ( F = 48.14, p = 0.0001).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Anzani et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69af947370916d39fea4b6e5https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kscej.2026.100574
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper