Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Systematic review reports improved survival outcomes in older AML patients with ASXL1 mutations using DEC and VEN, suggesting potential clinical benefits.
Decitabine (DEC) and Venetoclax (VEN) are approved for elderly adult acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with an additional sex comb-like 1 (ASXL1) mutation who cannot tolerate intensive chemotherapy. However, direct comparative data in this population remain limited. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to assess the indirect efficacy of DEC alone and VEN in older AML patients with ASXL1 mutations. A matched cohort was created by comparing outcomes of consecutive adults with AML who received DEC or DEC with VEN after propensity score matching using the nearest-neighbor methodology. The DEC + VEN cohort had a lower early mortality rate than the DEC cohort (30-day mortality: 2.7%-5% vs. 9.7%, p = 0.01; RR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.97 versus RR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.92-1.02). However, the 30-day and 60-day mortality rates were similar between groups (9.5% vs. 2.7%, p = 0.17; 18.9% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.16). Overall survival (OS) was measured at 7.9-25.1 months. The DEC + VEN cohort had significantly higher response rates than the decitabine cohort. According to the 2017 EL N Genetic Risk classification, people with a favorable moderate risk had a higher rate of complete response or complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery than those with high risk (65% vs. 34%). The use of DEC for 5 or 10 days as the hypomethylating agents combination with VEN did not affect the CR/Cri rate. In conclusion, DEC plus VEN was associated with improved clinical responses and survival signals in ASXL1-mutated AML, warranting prospective confirmation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ding et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: