Pilot trial compares delayed and immediate financial incentives for smoking cessation, suggesting feasibility and promising quit rates.
This study compared delayed- versus immediate-reward financial incentives using a weekly reward frequency. Smokers were randomized in a single blinded study of 2 groups: Reward Group used an immediate-reward strategy and Banked-Money Group used a delayed-reward strategy. Subjects received personalized smoking cessation plans, presented weekly for smoking tests measuring exhaled CO (COex) and received $40 for passing. The Reward Group immediately received $40 whereas the Banked-Money Group's $40 was placed in an account they could access only upon successful study completion. During the first 3 months, subjects could fail 2 tests before a 3 rd disqualified them. During the last month, any positive smoking test disqualified them. If disqualified, the Reward Group members kept all previously received rewards however the Banked-Money Group members lost all accrued money. Follow up visits occurred at 3 and 6 months after trial completion. Twelve (33%) participants quit smoking in intention to treat analysis with 9 (75%) remaining abstinent 6 months after trial completion. The Reward Group had 5 of 15 (33%) quit versus 7 of 16 (43.8%) in the Banked-Money Group. Conclusions : This pilot trial shows the financial incentive protocol is feasible with favorable quit rates compared to previously published data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sathya et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: